• WHAT´S THE STATE FOR, IF "TOXIC" ONES HAVE BEEN TRICKIER?

Undoubtedly the State intervention could have been expected to fix the "cumulative toxicity." Although the "shields" that were spread between executives, are for a crisis clear and pure: that is, we have sent all the shit, but we have earn very well for the rest of our days. Who causes the crisis reflects this truism: no one has money, yes I will.
"When there is no crisis" large groups of millionaires, and financial, to meet and most often come to this recipe (for people) : the welfare state, it is not possible. It is an unreallistyc dream...

Which would only be possible "state of unrest." And if we are working, we are wrong, we're slaves. Since the slave is the one that works without any benefit either to him. What is more, in Rome, slaves were to be very valuable for its training, even on intellectual areas, or the very beautiful women- slaves, for instance. But in more recent work camps, slavery was only a formality for extermination: strenuous work, very cold, and watery rations once a day with a piece of bread. The work was secondary and the first death.

Unable to accept this plan of life for us that we have rights and we are better than them. And we have children.

When we go to jail for not paying a small tax, what should be done with wich not only inhibited the ability to raise of the State (firms that close) but they have forced the State to put for them fabulous sums of money for their "toxicity" ?

Of course the environment is very important, today.