C'EST LA GUERRE (88)

But I´m following the reading (surely, a contribution of other important autors):

.... we are before a primitive brain which cannot process an input and convert it to words to communicate it. On the other hand, a hunter does not have many things to communicate to his preys... Instead, they can representing through actions, their mental vision. And its unique mental vision, the primeval and original one, no more than their evident disappearance, even like an individual of a privileged caste although primitive. So they can´t comment about the beauty of a woman, or a good food, much less a landscape, etc. but at the same time, something starts growing inside its brain which will take him to posses or destroy. He does not talk but can kill whom has shown a defiance attitude toward his power. Therefore it is only an animal selfishness, incapable of intelligent human relationship.

They can´t have enemies nor friends. For a hunter there are only preys, and everything has the same value and a same value, is a same utility. For him a gazelle is not beautiful, but it is a prey that should be theirs. He "is" a brain without spirituality we might say, which only craves any object above all after seeing it,..  (perhaps too literal with their essence of hunters: since they are second on the top of the pyramid, they want everything to be theirs and at their direct disposal...) When they do not kill, betray and when they are desiring, it is prostituting someone or something. Soon their coveted object, would become in a very short time the power, a.k.a. political power, since with this object, he can get "magically" all other objects in the broadest sense: obviously a beautiful maiden, is one more object in their brain. Always to posses or destroy after seeing and desiring.

The Neanderthal man is the greatest example of "not-guilty feeling" by the same primitive structure of their brain. But he is always guilty because is a "wonderful" killer. Guilt is a famous "workhorse" in the "Psychology" of power; for many, it is a Jewish invention (which is always fucking) but clearly is something much more ancient. Something leads Neanderthal to possess, sometimes destroys (hunting is always violent) and on their mental structure there is no a place for anything else, not even the guilt. Instead Cro-Magnon is able to feel joy, to be happy while they are away from the Neanderthal influence, no more it is needed, not even for entrepreneurs. But today... enough take a gander to the newspapers.

All this, we repeat, by their essential constitution and brain, Neanderthal could act only in this way and with an inferior species, would have acted similarly, although both species would had become extinct together. Even if we think of other planets, as a still more intelligent species than Cro-Magnon species, the attempt of Neanderthal would have been the same only in degree of attempt, obviously. This would pose new approaches about being "superior" which power has always considered its main premise.

In synthesis, the Neanderthal man had decided hunting down Cro-Magnon man. We know that they were men of "nutshell" by which they began to do things for this war to death against the "Sapiens" and "Sapientia".